With that being said, the Vino has slightly better low-end torque than the Met I, but the Met I has a slightly higher top speed. When I'm riding my Vino with my friend(who has a Met I), I leave her in the dust at every stoplight but she eventually catches up and passes me after a couple of miles. Other than that they are too similar to say one is better than the other. I brake better than she does but she gets a smoother ride. That could be differences in the particular bikes rather than differences in model design. Both are very easy to work on, very reliable, and inexpensive to operate. My 6,000 mile tune-up cost me less than $20.00 in parts and supplies.
Feel free to e-mail with any further questions. Happy scootering!Which is better a honda metropolitan scooter or yamaha vino scooter? Why?I'm going to have say the Honda Metropolitan. I don't know if Yamaha started making the Vino a 4-stroke engine but I the 4stroke engine is better than a 2stroke that the Yamaha Vino has. It's like riding your weedeater. It's noisier and pollutes more. That's why larger motorcycles use 4stroke.
Report Abuse
Which is better a honda metropolitan scooter or yamaha vino scooter? Why?Both bikes are excellent, for what they are, which are small slow moped class scooters. The Honda has a 4 stroke engine, and I may be wrong, but, the Yamaha Vino originally had a 2 stroke engine (that may have changed for 2007??). I personally would prefer the 4stroke, however, Yamaha most certainly knows how to build excellent 2 stroke motors. Correct me if I am wrong, but, isn't the metrpolitan II the faster non-moped class scooter that will need to be registered as a motorcycle? If thats the case you might just as well spend a few more bucks and get the larger Vino 125. Of course, dealer location, reputation, and what you can talk the dealer into throwing in may figuere in also.
No comments:
Post a Comment